Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Edward R. Belding, 72-1021 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 72-1021 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 21, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 462 F.2d 624 INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward R. BELDING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 72-1021 Summary Calendar. * United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 21, 1972. Danny Cupti, Dixon L. Pyles, Pyles & Tucker, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant. L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., Fountain D. Dawson, Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc., by Beverly N. Ballantine, Greenville, Miss., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr., W. C. Smith, Jr., Jackson, Miss
More

462 F.2d 624

INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORPORATION et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edward R. BELDING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 72-1021 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 1972.

Danny Cupti, Dixon L. Pyles, Pyles & Tucker, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., Fountain D. Dawson, Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc., by Beverly N. Ballantine, Greenville, Miss., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr., W. C. Smith, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for Teamsters Local Union No. 891.

Lawrence J. Frank, Jackson, Miss., R. Ian Hunter, Detroit, Mich., Sorrell Logothetis, Jackson, Miss., Knee, Snyder & Parks, Dayton, Ohio, for Teamsters Local Union No. 654.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated fewer than all of the claims, and the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1291. Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

2

Dismissed.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer