Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edward Eugene Brown v. U. S. Attorney General, 72-3020 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 72-3020 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 15, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 469 F.2d 697 Edward Eugene BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 72-3020. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 15, 1972. Edward Brown, pro se. John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., William P. Gaffney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees. Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant having failed to file a brief, this appeal is referred to us under the provisions of Local Rule 9(c
More

469 F.2d 697

Edward Eugene BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 72-3020.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Edward Brown, pro se.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., William P. Gaffney, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondents-appellees.

Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant having failed to file a brief, this appeal is referred to us under the provisions of Local Rule 9(c)(2).1 The record reveals that the appeal is entirely lacking in merit and we therefore dismiss.2

1

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981

2

See Local Rule 20; Eisenhardt v. United States, 5th Cir. 1972, 461 F.2d 1267

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer