Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roger C. Myers, D/B/A Romyco Stereo v. Ampex, Inc., 1092 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 1092 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 21, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 498 F.2d 1092 1974-2 Trade Cases 75,220 Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMPEX, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 73-3510 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409 , PartI. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Aug. 21, 1974. Roger C. Myers, pro se. Stanley McMurry, Dallas, Tex., for Cap. Records. James W. Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for Columbia. R. Daniel
More

498 F.2d 1092

1974-2 Trade Cases 75,220

Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMPEX, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 73-3510 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,

431 F.2d 409, PartI.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 21, 1974.

Roger C. Myers, pro se.

Stanley McMurry, Dallas, Tex., for Cap. Records.

James W. Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for Columbia.

R. Daniel Settle, Fort Worth, Tex., for RCA.

J. Hoke Peacock, II, Beaumont, Tex., for Harry Fox Agency, Inc.

John F. Still, pro se.

Joseph Bonner, Nowata, Okl., for other defendants-appellees.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Pursuant to our remand,1 the district court for the Eastern District of Texas has examined Appellant's complaint in his action before the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court for the Eastern District of Texas again concluded that Appellant's claim was identical to that dismissed in the Western District of Oklahoma. We affirm, concluding that the doctrine of direct estoppel bars the claim.2

1

Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974)

2

See Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2373, at 238-39

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer