Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

1104 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 1104 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 01, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 491 F.2d 1104 85 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2920 , 73 Lab.Cas. P 14,439 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. PLUMBERS AND STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 100, et al., Respondents. No. 73-3145 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 1, 1974. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William E. Youngblood, Regi
More

491 F.2d 1104

85 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2920, 73 Lab.Cas. P 14,439

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
PLUMBERS AND STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 100, et al., Respondents.
No. 73-3145 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 1, 1974.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., William E. Youngblood, Regional Atty., Region 16, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner.

David R. Richards, Austin, Tex., for respondents.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This case involves a petition for the enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board), as authorized by 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 160(e) (1970). The Board found that the Respondent union had engaged in conduct violative of sections 8(b)(2) and 8(b)(1)(A) and section 8(b)(1)(B) by refusing to accept valid travel cards presented to it by members of sister locals, in contravention of the constitution and by-laws of the United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters Industry, and by attempting to cause the discharge of members of the sister locals from the employ of the McCally Company. We conclude that there is substantial evidence disclosed by the record to support the Board's findings and conclusions. The order will be enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer