Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The United States of America v. Ernest Wesley Miller, 73-1083 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 73-1083 Visitors: 42
Filed: Jul. 08, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 499 F.2d 1247 The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest Wesley MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73-1083. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 8, 1974. Ray Gene Smith, Wichita Falls, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant. Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Robert G. Darden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, C
More

499 F.2d 1247

The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ernest Wesley MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 73-1083.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 8, 1974.

Ray Gene Smith, Wichita Falls, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Robert G. Darden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Court has considered the petition for rehearing en banc with respect to the retroactivity issue only, and is of the opinion that the decision of the panel 5 Cir., 492 F.2d 37 is correct. The petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied by the panel.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer