Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

74-2711 (1977)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 74-2711 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 16, 1977
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 559 F.2d 282 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1809 , 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7865 Oliver I. SABALA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. WESTERN GILLETTE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Leonard M. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WESTERN GILLETTE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-2711. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Sept. 16, 1977. G. William Baab, Dallas, Tex., for So. Conf. of Teams. A. J
More

559 F.2d 282

15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1809, 15 Empl. Prac.
Dec. P 7865
Oliver I. SABALA, Individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
WESTERN GILLETTE, INC., et al.,
Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Leonard M. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WESTERN GILLETTE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 74-2711.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1977.

G. William Baab, Dallas, Tex., for So. Conf. of Teams.

A. J. Harper, II, Houston, Tex., for Western Gillette.

Theodore W. Russell, Los Angeles, Cal., for Western Gillette et al.

James P. Wolf, Houston, Tex., for Local Union 988.

Henry M. Rosenblum, Houston, Tex., for Sabala.

Sidney Ravkind, Houston, Tex., for Ramirez.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before WISDOM, SIMPSON, and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment of this Court in Sabala v. Western Gillette, Inc., 5 Cir. 1975, 516 F.2d 1251, and remanded the cause to this Court for further consideration in light of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States, 1977, 431 U.S. ----, 97 S. Ct. 1843, 52 L. Ed. 2d 396.

2

In the circumstances of this case, in which we affirmed the District Court's judgment in large part, we think it appropriate for the District Court, in the first instance, to reconsider its decision in light of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States. The case is therefore remanded to the District Court for that purpose. The District Court may conduct a hearing and the parties submit new evidence within limits the court considers proper.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer