Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael v. Costello v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, 75-2392 (1977)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 75-2392 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 31, 1977
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 553 F.2d 506 Michael V. COSTELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Defendant-Appellant. No. 75-2392. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 31, 1977. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond W. Gearey, Atty. for Fla. Div. of Corrections, John A. Barley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., William C. Sherrill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant. Tobias Simon, Miami, Fla. (court-appointed not und
More

553 F.2d 506

Michael V. COSTELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75-2392.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 1977.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond W. Gearey, Atty. for Fla. Div. of Corrections, John A. Barley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., William C. Sherrill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Tobias Simon, Miami, Fla. (court-appointed not under Act), Jack Greenberg, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Brian K. Landsberg, William C. Graves, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, GEWIN*, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER *, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY**, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The United States Supreme Court reversed the decision of this Court reported at 539 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1976), and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in Costello v. Wainwright, --- U.S. ----, 97 S. Ct. 1191, 51 L. Ed. 2d 372 (1977). The case was taken en banc for consideration of the three-judge court issue. The Court does not regard the remaining issues in the case to be enbancworthy. Therefore, the Court reinstates the panel opinion reported at 525 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1976) as the decision in this case, and orders that the mandate be issued forthwith.

*

Judge in active service at the time of the en banc hearing and decision, but has since become a Senior Judge

**

Judge Fay was not a member of the Court of Appeals at the time of the hearing or decision en banc

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer