Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. William W. Holland, 76-3763 (1978)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 76-3763 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 04, 1978
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 565 F.2d 383 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William W. HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 76-3763. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Jan. 4, 1978. Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Charles S. Coody, Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellant. Barry E. Teague, U. S. Atty., Milton L. Moss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOF
More

565 F.2d 383

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William W. HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-3763.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1978.

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Charles S. Coody, Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Barry E. Teague, U. S. Atty., Milton L. Moss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at 552 F.2d 667, be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer