Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

84-1970 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 84-1970 Visitors: 42
Filed: Oct. 14, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 857 F.2d 262 Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele, Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon, Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., and Aaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Billy J. "B.J." PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinter Energy Company, and Pinter Oil Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 84-1970. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Oct. 14, 1988. Braden W. Sparks, Newman, Shook & McManemin, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellant
More

857 F.2d 262

Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele,
Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon,
Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., and
Aaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Billy J. "B.J." PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinter
Energy Company, and Pinter Oil Company,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 84-1970.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 14, 1988.

Braden W. Sparks, Newman, Shook & McManemin, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

John A. Spinuzzi, Denton, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; A. Joe Fish, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BROWN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of this court (787 F.2d 985; 794 F.2d 1016) affirming the district court's judgment for plaintiff Dahl has been vacated by the Supreme Court. --- U.S. ----, 108 S. Ct. 2063, 100 L. Ed. 2d 658 (1988). The Court called for further findings to meet the standards it established for determining (1) the availability of an in pari delicto defense under Sec. 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, and (2) status as a statutory seller for purposes of imposing liability under Sec. 12(1). The cause is remanded to the district court for further findings consistent with the Supreme Court's holdings and for determination, if appropriate, of contribution to Pinter by Dahl. The district court may, if it chooses, take additional evidence on these issues.

2

REMANDED.

*

Due to his death on October 19, 1987, Judge Hill did not participate in this decision. This case is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer