Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Dan Morales, Attorney General of the State of Texas, 90-8387 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 90-8387 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 14, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1512 1992-2 Trade Cases P 69,912 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dan MORALES, Attorney General of the State of Texas, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 90-8387. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 14, 1992. Robert F. Manifold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Seattle, Wash., for Atty. Gen. of Washington. Jane F. Wheeler, Ned Bastow, Asst. Attys. Gen., Oklahoma City, for Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma. Hugh Kenny, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Cheyenne, Wyo., for Atty. Gen
More

966 F.2d 1512

1992-2 Trade Cases P 69,912

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Dan MORALES, Attorney General of the State of Texas, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 90-8387.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 14, 1992.

Robert F. Manifold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Seattle, Wash., for Atty. Gen. of Washington.

Jane F. Wheeler, Ned Bastow, Asst. Attys. Gen., Oklahoma City, for Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma.

Hugh Kenny, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Cheyenne, Wyo., for Atty. Gen. of Wyoming.

Timothy Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for Atty. Gen. of Oregon.

Clayton S. Friedman, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, Mo., for Atty. Gen. of Missouri.

Ernest L. Sarason, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of AG, Consumer Protection Div., Boston, Mass., for Atty. Gen. of Massachusetts.

Charlotte H. Rappuhn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Tenn., for Atty. Gen. of Tennessee.

Andrea C. Levine, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York St. Dept. of Law, New York City, for Atty. Gen. of New York.

Robert J. Lamont, Sen. Deputy Atty. Gen., Charleston, W. Va., for Atty. Gen. of West Virginia.

Lisa Barrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montpelier, Vt., for Atty. Gen. of Vermont.

Catherine K. Broad, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, Idaho, for Atty. Gen. of Idaho.

Jeffrey P. Hallem, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, S.D., for Atty. Gen. of South Dakota.

Vincent DeMarco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, Md., for Atty. Gen. of Maryland.

David Woodward, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., for Atty. Gen. of Minnesota.

Carmen D. Claudio, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for Atty. Gen. of Arizona.

Robert T. Stephan, Atty. Gen., Topeka, Kan., for Atty. Gen. of Kansas.

James C. Gulick, Special Atty. Gen., K.D. Sturgis, Asst. Atty. Gen., N.C. Dept. of Justice, Raleigh, N.C., for Atty. Gen. of North Carolina.

David W. Huey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bismarck, N.D., for Atty. Gen. of North Dakota.

Stephen Gardner, Craig Jordan, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dallas, Tex., for Atty. Gen. of Texas.

Robert M. Langer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., for Atty. Gen. of Connecticut.

Ellen B. Leidner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Consumer Protection Div., Columbus, Ohio, for Atty. Gen. of Ohio.

Richard L. Cleland, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Iowa Dept. of Justice, Des Moines, Iowa, for Atty. Gen. of Iowa.

Barbara W. Tuerkheimer, Madison, Wis., for Atty. Gen. of Wisconsin.

Albert N. Shelden, Deputy Atty. Gen., John K. Van de Kamp, San Diego, Cal., for Atty. Gen. of California.

Ronald D. Secrest, David Wilks Corban, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Andrew C. Freedman, Fulbright & Jaworski, New York City, Frederick deB. Bostwick, III, Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, Waco, Tex., for appellees Trans World Airlines, et al.

Mary McGuire Voog, Mark A. Buckstein, Mount Kisco, N.Y., for Trans World Airlines, Inc.

John J. Williams, Associate Gen. Counsel, Houston, Tex., for Continental Airlines, Inc.

Karen K. Crider, Jackson Heights, N.Y., Mark McCall, Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, D.C., for British Airways PLC.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOHNSON, SMITH and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Pursuant to the Supreme Court opinion in Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S. Ct. 2031, 2041, 119 L. Ed. 2d 157 (1992), this Court remands this case to the district court for the imposition of an injunction that is limited to the attempted enforcement of the fare advertising sections of the challenged guidelines. In all other respects, this Court affirms the judgment of the district court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer