Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barry v. Fordice, 92-7806 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 92-7806 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 10, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 1 David J. BARRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kirk FORDICE, Governor, in his capacity as Chairman and Commissioner of the State Bond Retirement Commission and in his capacity as Commissioner of the State Bond Commission, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-7806. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1993. Paul M. Neville, Minniece, Hamill, Wilson, Mitts & Neville, Jackson, MS, for plaintiffs-appellants. T. Hunt Cole, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mike Moore, Atty. Ge
More

8 F.3d 1

David J. BARRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kirk FORDICE, Governor, in his capacity as Chairman and
Commissioner of the State Bond Retirement Commission and in
his capacity as Commissioner of the State Bond Commission,
et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7806.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1993.

Paul M. Neville, Minniece, Hamill, Wilson, Mitts & Neville, Jackson, MS, for plaintiffs-appellants.

T. Hunt Cole, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Jackson, MS, for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Before GARWOOD and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the district court's dismissal of their suit for want of jurisdiction under the Eleventh Amendment. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion. Barry v. Fordice, 814 F. Supp. 511 (S.D.Miss.1992).

2

AFFIRMED.

*

District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer