Filed: Nov. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30137 Summary Calendar _ ANTONINO F. ANZALONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and RON S. MACALUSO of Seale, Macaluso, Daigle & Ross, Intervenor-Plaintiff, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CV-2248 - - - - - - - - - - November 28, 1995 Before JOHNSON, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonin
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30137 Summary Calendar _ ANTONINO F. ANZALONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and RON S. MACALUSO of Seale, Macaluso, Daigle & Ross, Intervenor-Plaintiff, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CV-2248 - - - - - - - - - - November 28, 1995 Before JOHNSON, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonino..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-30137
Summary Calendar
__________________
ANTONINO F. ANZALONE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
RON S. MACALUSO of Seale, Macaluso,
Daigle & Ross,
Intervenor-Plaintiff,
versus
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 93-CV-2248
- - - - - - - - - -
November 28, 1995
Before JOHNSON, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antonino F. Anzalone appeals the jury's verdict in favor of
defendant Allstate Insurance Company regarding suit brought
pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.
ยงยง 12101-12213. Anzalone maintains that the district court made
erroneous evidentiary rulings and that the evidence was
insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Because review of
the briefs and the record reveals no reversible error, we AFFIRM.
AFFIRMED.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.