Filed: Nov. 30, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30435 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFRED HENRY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 93-CR-20001) - - - - - - - - - - December 7, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a machinegun in relat
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30435 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFRED HENRY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 93-CR-20001) - - - - - - - - - - December 7, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a machinegun in relati..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-30435 (Summary Calendar) __________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFRED HENRY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 93-CR-20001) - - - - - - - - - - December 7, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a machinegun in relation to a drug trafficking crime. He argues that he was entitled to downward departures for providing substantial assistance to the Government and for reduced mental capacity and that the Government breached the plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and the reasoning of the district court and find no reversible error. Thus, essentially for the reasons * Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. stated orally by the district court at the hearing held on April 27, 1995, and in the written ruling issued the same day, the conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2