Filed: Dec. 08, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30636 Summary Calendar _ DON TRUEBLOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; THOMAS GRACE, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee/agent of the USA/IRS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (CV-94-2315) _ December 15, 1995 Before REAVLEY, DUHÉ AND WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Do
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30636 Summary Calendar _ DON TRUEBLOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; THOMAS GRACE, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee/agent of the USA/IRS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (CV-94-2315) _ December 15, 1995 Before REAVLEY, DUHÉ AND WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Don..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 95-30636
Summary Calendar
_____________________
DON TRUEBLOOD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;
THOMAS GRACE, Individually and in his
official capacity as an employee/agent of
the USA/IRS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Western District of Louisiana
(CV-94-2315)
_______________________________________________________
December 15, 1995
Before REAVLEY, DUHÉ AND WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Don Trueblood appeals from the district court’s dismissal of
his complaint pursuant to the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C.
§ 7421(a). He argues that the district court should have
construed his claim under the Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; applied a judicially-created exception to
*
Local rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
the Anti-Injunction Act; determined that the complaint was
subject to a statutory exemption under 26 U.S.C. § 6213; and
construed portions of his complaint as alleging civil rights
claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
essentially the reasons given by the district court. Trueblood
v. United States, No. CV-94-2315 (W.D. La. May 26, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
2