United States v. Jury, 95-40523 (1995)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-40523
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 05, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40523 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SCOTTIE SHARROD JURY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CR-1-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 12, 1995 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiring to possess
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40523 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SCOTTIE SHARROD JURY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CR-1-1 - - - - - - - - - - December 12, 1995 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiring to possess ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40523
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SCOTTIE SHARROD JURY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:95-CR-1-1
- - - - - - - - - -
December 12, 1995
Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals from his guilty plea conviction and
sentence for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute a
controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and
846. He contends that the district court erred in applying a
two-level enhancement for his leadership role in the offense
under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). We have reviewed the record and the
district court's oral ruling and find no reversible error.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
No. 95-40523
-2-
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener