Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sidney Marts v. Phillip Hines, 94-30513 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 94-30513 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 14, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 79 F.3d 17 Sidney MARTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phillip HINES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-30513. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 14, 1996. Sidney Marts, New Orleans, LA, pro se. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Frederick J.R. Heebe, Judge. (Opinion November 8, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 68 F.3d 134 ) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M
More

79 F.3d 17

Sidney MARTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Phillip HINES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-30513.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 14, 1996.

Sidney Marts, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Frederick J.R. Heebe, Judge.

(Opinion November 8, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 68 F.3d 134)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without oral argument.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer