Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10384 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMIAH POWELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:94-CR-126-A) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jeremiah Powell appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribut
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10384 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEREMIAH POWELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:94-CR-126-A) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jeremiah Powell appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10384
(Summary Calendar)
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEREMIAH POWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(USDC No. 4:94-CR-126-A)
- - - - - - - - - -
May 17, 1996
Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jeremiah Powell appeals his conviction for possession of
marijuana with intent to distribute. He contends that district
court impermissibly limited the scope of cross-examination and that
the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Our
review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us
that no reversible error was committed. The court's limitation of
repetitive cross-examination did not rise to the level of plain
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
error. See United States v. Coleman,
997 F.2d 1101, 1105 (5th Cir.
1993), cert. denied,
114 S. Ct. 893 (1994). The evidence was
sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Powell guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. See United States v. Pennington,
20 F.3d 593,
597 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
2