Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10474 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus UYI KING OSAYANDE, a/k/a King Uyi Osayande, BEST EGBE AIKPITANYI, a/k/a Best Aikpitany, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas 3:94-CR-410-G June 17, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and, EMILIO M. GARZA Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Uyi King Osayande appeals his conviction of conspiracy to possess with
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10474 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus UYI KING OSAYANDE, a/k/a King Uyi Osayande, BEST EGBE AIKPITANYI, a/k/a Best Aikpitany, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas 3:94-CR-410-G June 17, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and, EMILIO M. GARZA Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Uyi King Osayande appeals his conviction of conspiracy to possess with ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 95-10474
(Summary Calendar)
_________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
UYI KING OSAYANDE, a/k/a King Uyi Osayande,
BEST EGBE AIKPITANYI, a/k/a Best Aikpitany,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
3:94-CR-410-G
June 17, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and, EMILIO M. GARZA Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Uyi King Osayande appeals his conviction of conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute heroin and possession with intent
to distribute heroin. Best Egbe Aikpitanyi appeals his conviction
of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute.
Osayande argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him
on both counts and that the district court erred in admitting
certain evidence at trial. Aikpitanyi argues that there was
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
insufficient evidence to convict him, the district court erred in
admitting certain evidence at trial, and that the district court
erred in attributing 1,164 grams of heroin to him for sentencing
purposes. Our review of the record and the relevant authorities
convinces us that no reversible error was committed.
Osayande and Aikpitanyi have failed to demonstrate a manifest
miscarriage of justice with regard to their claims of insufficient
evidence. United States v. Laury, 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.),
cert. denied,
116 S. Ct. 162,
133 L. Ed. 2d 105 (1995). The
passport evidence was properly admitted as intrinsic evidence.
United States v. Garcia,
27 F.3d 1009, 1014 (5th Cir.), cert.
denied,
115 S. Ct. 531,
130 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1994). The district
court did not clearly err in including 1,164 grams of heroin as
part of Aikpitanyi’s relevant conduct for sentencing purposes.
United States v. Woods,
907 F.2d 1540, 1542-43 (5th Cir. 1990),
cert. denied,
498 U.S. 1070,
111 S. Ct. 792,
112 L. Ed. 2d 854
(1991).
For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the defendants’
convictions and Aikpitanyi’s sentence.
-2-
