Filed: Feb. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10690 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS EDGAR BELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:92-CV-108 - - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Thomas Edgar Bell appeals the denial of his motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10690 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS EDGAR BELL, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:92-CV-108 - - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Thomas Edgar Bell appeals the denial of his motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. B..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10690
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS EDGAR BELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:92-CV-108
- - - - - - - - - -
April 19, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Thomas Edgar Bell appeals the denial of his motion for
relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Bell contends that counsel
was ineffective for failing to object to the form of
methamphetamine considered at sentencing. We affirm for
essentially the reasons relied upon by the district court in its
order adopting the magistrate judge's supplemental report. Bell
v. United States, No. 2:90-CR-0017-01 (N.D. Tex. July 27, 1995).
Bell does not argue other issues raised in the district court;
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-10690
-2-
those issues are abandoned. Hobbs v. Blackburn,
752 F.2d 1079,
1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
474 U.S. 838 (1985).
AFFIRMED.