United States v. Miller, 95-10731 (1996)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-10731
Visitors: 34
Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10731 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VERNON ANTHONY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:94-CR-343-G) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Vernon Anthony Miller challenges the district court's finding that he was co
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10731 (Summary Calendar) _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VERNON ANTHONY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:94-CR-343-G) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Vernon Anthony Miller challenges the district court's finding that he was com..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-10731 (Summary Calendar) __________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VERNON ANTHONY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:94-CR-343-G) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Vernon Anthony Miller challenges the district court's finding that he was competent to stand trial for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, bank robbery and aiding and abetting, using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence and aiding and abetting, and interstate transport of a stolen vehicle and aiding and abetting. We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and the record and find no error in the district court's finding. We affirm essentially * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. for the reasons explained by the district court in its ruling given at the conclusion of the hearing held on April 5, 1996. AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
