Filed: Jul. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10776 Summary Calendar _ MIGUEL REYNA, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-035-C _ July 17, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Miguel Reyna appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition on grounds
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10776 Summary Calendar _ MIGUEL REYNA, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-035-C _ July 17, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Miguel Reyna appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition on grounds o..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 95-10776
Summary Calendar
_______________________
MIGUEL REYNA,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Institutional Division,
Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:95-CV-035-C
_________________________________________________________________
July 17, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Miguel Reyna appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus
petition on grounds of writ abuse. Having reviewed the record and
briefs, we AFFIRM the judgment for essentially the same reasons
adopted by the district court. Reyna v. Scott, No. 6:95-CV-045-C
(N.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 1995). We add that petitioner has not alleged
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
facts sufficient to bypass the cause and prejudice requirement with
a showing of “factual innocence.” Sawyer v. Whitley, ___ U.S. ___,
112 S. Ct. 2514 (1992). He alleges that he shot his former lover
twice in self-defense at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun. This
issue, far from being concealed, was sent to the jury, and they
rejected it. Such facts do not amount to a colorable claim of
innocence that would permit Reyna to escape the doctrine of writ
abuse.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2