Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Payne v. Cole, 95-10822 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-10822 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10822 _ IN THE MATTER OF: JACK COLE, Debtor. JACK COLE, Appellant, versus RAY PAYNE; DIANE PAYNE, Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:94-CV-2013-R) _ April 9, 1996 Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This Court accepts jurisdiction under the rationale of Matter of Cajun Electric Power Coop., Inc., 69 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 1995), but, after considering
More
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                          __________________

                             No. 95-10822
                          __________________

     IN THE MATTER OF:    JACK COLE,

                                         Debtor.

     JACK COLE,

                                          Appellant,

                                versus

     RAY PAYNE; DIANE PAYNE,

                                          Appellees.

            ______________________________________________

         Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                      Northern District of Texas
                           (3:94-CV-2013-R)
            ______________________________________________

                             April 9, 1996


Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     This Court accepts jurisdiction under the rationale of Matter

of Cajun Electric Power Coop., Inc., 
69 F.3d 746
(5th Cir. 1995),

but, after considering the briefs, arguments, and relevant portions

of the record, this Court affirms the district court’s judgment

essentially for the reasons given by that court.



     *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
    AFFIRMED




2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer