Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-10833 Summary Calendar RAYE ELLEN STILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-028-C - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raye Ellen Stiles appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing he
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-10833 Summary Calendar RAYE ELLEN STILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-028-C - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raye Ellen Stiles appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing her..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-10833
Summary Calendar
RAYE ELLEN STILES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:94-CV-028-C
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Raye Ellen Stiles appeals from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment, dismissing her Equal Pay Act claim under 29
U.S.C. § 206. Stiles argues that genuine issues of material fact
remain which preclude summary judgment. New alleged
inconsistencies raised on appeal are not subject to review.
Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New
Orleans,
32 F.3d 953, 963 n.46 (5th Cir. 1994). We have reviewed
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-10833
- 2 -
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Stiles v. GTE Southwest Inc., No. 6:94-CV-028-C (N.D. Tex. Aug.
17, 1995). Stiles has identified no abuse of discretion in the
district court’s denial of her postjudgment motion. See Seven
Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi,
635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. Unit A Jan.
1981).
Stiles’ motion to strike portions of appellee’s brief is
DENIED.
AFFIRMED.