Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10923 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERTO PACHECO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:95-CR-064-R) _ May 22, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, challenging the district
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10923 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERTO PACHECO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:95-CR-064-R) _ May 22, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, challenging the district ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10923
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERTO PACHECO-MORALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas
(3:95-CR-064-R)
______________________________________________
May 22, 1996
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to
distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, challenging the
district court's denial of his motion to suppress the evidence. We
have reviewed his arguments and the record and find no error in the
district court's reasoning announced at the conclusion of the June
15, 1995, suppression hearing. We have no jurisdiction to consider
Appellant's Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion inasmuch as the district
*
Pursuant to Local rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
court has not ruled on such a motion. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1291.
AFFIRMED.
2