Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roberson v. Franklin, 95-10967 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-10967 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10967 Conference Calendar _ REGINALD CHARLES ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN FRANKLIN, Detention Services Officer; DALLAS COUNTY; JIM BOULES, Dallas County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-1442-T - - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Reginald Cha
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                          __________________

                              No. 95-10967
                          Conference Calendar
                           __________________


REGINALD CHARLES ROBERSON,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN FRANKLIN, Detention Services Officer;
DALLAS COUNTY; JIM BOULES, Dallas County Sheriff,

                                       Defendants-Appellees.


                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 3:95-CV-1442-T
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 19, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Reginald Charles Roberson appeals the dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous.     We have

reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s findings and find

no error in the district court’s determination that the complaint

is frivolous as it is barred by the applicable Texas two-year

statute of limitations.     See Roberson v. Franklin, No. 3:95-CV-

1442-T (N.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 1995); Gartrell v. Gaylor, 
981 F.2d 254
, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).


     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
                          No. 95-10967
                               -2-

     Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.   5th Cir.

Rule 42.2.

     Roberson’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal

is DENIED as moot.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer