Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk, 95-20560 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-20560 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20560 Summary Calendar _ NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, As receiver for First Republicbank Houston NA and KWP FINANCIAL I, INC., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus ALLEN HOUK, Trustee, Et Al., Defendants SIU NIN NG, also known as David Ng; PO-SHIN WONG NG Defendants - Appellants. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-91-571) _ June 21, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. P
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 95-20560 Summary Calendar _____________________ NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, As receiver for First Republicbank Houston NA and KWP FINANCIAL I, INC., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus ALLEN HOUK, Trustee, Et Al., Defendants SIU NIN NG, also known as David Ng; PO-SHIN WONG NG Defendants - Appellants. ________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-91-571) ________________________________________________ June 21, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Siu Nin Ng and Po-Shin Wong Ng (Ngs) appeal an adverse summary judgment concerning a guaranty given by the Ngs in 1987. They * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. claim the existence of genuine issues of material facts concerning the meaning of the guaranty and the calculation of the amount due. Needless to say, we review a summary judgment de novo. Our review of the record does not reveal a material fact issue. Moreover, we find no reversible error in the district court's characterization of the "oral motion" for summary judgment as a "reurging" against the Ngs of the summary judgment motion filed earlier against the other defendants. AFFIRMED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer