Filed: Jun. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20659 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DUNDRE ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 95-CR-41-2 - - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Dundre Roberson appeals his conviction and sentence for using or carrying a firearm d
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20659 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DUNDRE ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 95-CR-41-2 - - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Dundre Roberson appeals his conviction and sentence for using or carrying a firearm du..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-20659
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DUNDRE ROBERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 95-CR-41-2
- - - - - - - - - -
May 20, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dundre Roberson appeals his conviction and sentence for
using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug-
trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). He argues
that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction in
light of the recent Supreme Court decision, Bailey v. United
States,
116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). Because the evidence was more
than sufficient to show that Roberson actively employed a pistol
in relation to the drug-trafficking offenses of which he was also
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-20659
-2-
convicted, his argument is meritless. See
Bailey, 116 S. Ct. at
508-09.
AFFIRMED.