Filed: Jul. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20779 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus LUIS RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-249 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess, and possession with intent to di
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20779 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus LUIS RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-249 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess, and possession with intent to dis..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20779
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LUIS RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-94-249
- - - - - - - - - -
July 1, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy
to possess, and possession with intent to distribute in excess of
five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He
contends the search of the vehicle he was driving violated his
rights under the Fourth Amendment. However, Rodriguez’s
unconditional plea of guilty constitutes a waiver of any
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-20779
- 2 -
objections to nonjurisdictional errors, including Fourth
Amendment caims. See Tollett v. Henderson,
411 U.S. 258, 267,
93
S. Ct. 1602, 1608,
36 L. Ed. 2d 235 (1973); United States v.
Smallwood,
920 F.2d 1231, 1240 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
501 U.S.
1238,
111 S. Ct. 2870,
115 L. Ed. 2d 1035 (1991).
The appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.