Filed: Jul. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20931 SOUTHWEST MOBILE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus STEWART & STEVENSON SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-92-386) July 12, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This matter is before the court on the appeal by Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc., of an
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20931 SOUTHWEST MOBILE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus STEWART & STEVENSON SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-92-386) July 12, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This matter is before the court on the appeal by Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc., of an a..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20931 SOUTHWEST MOBILE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, versus STEWART & STEVENSON SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-92-386) July 12, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This matter is before the court on the appeal by Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc., of an adverse jury verdict and the court’s award of attorneys’ fees, and also the court's denial of their motion for attorneys' fees. Having considered the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts of the records, and * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM. 2
