Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-30133 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SON T. TRAN, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CA-4087 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Son T. Tran appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 22
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-30133 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SON T. TRAN, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CA-4087 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Son T. Tran appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 225..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-30133
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SON T. TRAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 94-CA-4087
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Son T. Tran appeals from the district court’s denial of his
motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Tran's sole argument on appeal,
that the district court erred in departing upwardly in sentencing
him, is not a cognizable § 2255 issue. United States v. Vaughn,
955 F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992). Tran's appeal is frivolous,
and it is DISMISSED as such. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-10648
- 2 -
APPEAL DISMISSED.
