United States v. Bush, 95-30502 (1996)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-30502
Visitors: 34
Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30502 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID BUSH, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 92-CR-60013 - - - - - - - - - - December 27, 1995 Before GARWOOD, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, PER CURIAM:* David Bush appeals the revocation of his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and the sente
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30502 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID BUSH, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 92-CR-60013 - - - - - - - - - - December 27, 1995 Before GARWOOD, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, PER CURIAM:* David Bush appeals the revocation of his supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and the senten..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-30502
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID BUSH,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 92-CR-60013
- - - - - - - - - -
December 27, 1995
Before GARWOOD, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE,
PER CURIAM:*
David Bush appeals the revocation of his supervised release
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and the sentence he received
after such revocation. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's reasons for rejecting Bush's challenges to the
revocation proceedings and find no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
Source: CourtListener