Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-31110 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFRED D. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-30018 - - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alfred D. Lewis appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-31110 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFRED D. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-30018 - - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alfred D. Lewis appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by d..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-31110
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFRED D. LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CR-30018
- - - - - - - - - -
May 16, 1996
Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfred D. Lewis appeals his sentence, arguing that the
district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a
downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 and that the
court erred by denying his motion for a concurrent sentence
and/or for downward departure pursuant to §§ 5G1.3(b) and (c).
Because the sentencing court's refusal to depart downward
pursuant to § 5K2.0 was not the result of a violation of the law
or a misapplication of the guidelines, this court lacks
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
jurisdiction to review the court's refusal to depart. See United
States v. DiMarco,
46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). Section
5G1.3 is not applicable to Lewis's case because Lewis was not
subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment at the time of
sentencing. See § 5G1.3. Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
2