Filed: Jul. 12, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-31251 Summary Calendar _ CHARLES CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DARNELL FRANCOIS; CHARLES P. VOSBURG, Ph.D; JOSH SMITH; WELDON JEWELL; CLARENCE THIBODEAUX; SYLVESTER MUCKELROY, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-661-A-M2 - - - - - - - - - - June 20, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ch
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-31251 Summary Calendar _ CHARLES CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DARNELL FRANCOIS; CHARLES P. VOSBURG, Ph.D; JOSH SMITH; WELDON JEWELL; CLARENCE THIBODEAUX; SYLVESTER MUCKELROY, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-661-A-M2 - - - - - - - - - - June 20, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Cha..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-31251
Summary Calendar
__________________
CHARLES CARTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DARNELL FRANCOIS; CHARLES P. VOSBURG, Ph.D; JOSH SMITH;
WELDON JEWELL; CLARENCE THIBODEAUX; SYLVESTER MUCKELROY,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CV-661-A-M2
- - - - - - - - - -
June 20, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Carter, #115957, moves this court for in forma
pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's order
dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. For
the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by
the district court, we find this appeal to be frivolous. See
Carter v. Francois, No. 95-661-A (M.D. La. Oct. 23, 1995).
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-31251
-2-
Carter has not demonstrated that his due process rights were
violated during the Spears v. McCotter,
766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir.
1985), hearing. Carter's request to this court to amend his
complaint is DENIED.
Because Carter fails to state a nonfrivolous issue on
appeal, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED.
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.