Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40644 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GENE O. LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2) - - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a brief as required by A
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40644 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GENE O. LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2) - - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a brief as required by An..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40644
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GENE O. LINDSEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2)
- - - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
396 U.S. 738 (1967),
and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found
no nonfrivolous issue.** Accordingly, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
**
Lindsey filed a motion for an extension of time to
respond to counsel’s Anders motion. This response was granted;
however, Lindsey did not file a response.
No. 95-40644
-2-
United States v. Jackson,
578 F.2d 1162, 1164 (5th Cir. 1978);
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.