Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lindsey, 95-40644 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-40644 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40644 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GENE O. LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2) - - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a brief as required by A
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                           __________________

                            No. 95-40644
                        Conference Calendar
                         __________________


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENE O. LINDSEY,

                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                         - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2)
                        - - - - - - - - - - -
                            June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
396 U.S. 738
(1967),

and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found

no nonfrivolous issue.**    Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.       See




       Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
     **
        Lindsey filed a motion for an extension of time to
respond to counsel’s Anders motion. This response was granted;
however, Lindsey did not file a response.
                          No. 95-40644
                               -2-

United States v. Jackson, 
578 F.2d 1162
, 1164 (5th Cir. 1978);

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer