Filed: Apr. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40845 Conference Calendar _ ROBERT JOE McSPADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EVERARDO GARCIA; ROBERT J. BANKS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-95-CV-34 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert McSpadden appeals from the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his civi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40845 Conference Calendar _ ROBERT JOE McSPADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EVERARDO GARCIA; ROBERT J. BANKS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-95-CV-34 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert McSpadden appeals from the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his civil..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40845
Conference Calendar
__________________
ROBERT JOE McSPADDEN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
EVERARDO GARCIA; ROBERT J. BANKS,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-95-CV-34
- - - - - - - - - -
April 18, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert McSpadden appeals from the dismissal for lack of
jurisdiction of his civil rights complaint brought pursuant to
U.S.C. § 1983. McSpadden fails to present any argument that
draws the dismissal into question. See McSpadden v. Garcia, No
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-40845
-2-
B-95-CV-34 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 1995); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(6).
Accordingly, McSpadden's appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5th
Cir. R. 42.2. We caution McSpadden that any additional frivolo
appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the impositio
of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, McSpadden is further caution
to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise
arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.