Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dagley v. Rutherford, 95-40903 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-40903 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40903 Summary Calendar _ MYRON C. DAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus J.B. RUTHERFORD ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-54 - - - - - - - - - - May 8, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Myron C. Dagley appeals the grant of summary judgment for the defendants-appellees in his civil su
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-40903 Summary Calendar __________________ MYRON C. DAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus J.B. RUTHERFORD ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-54 - - - - - - - - - - May 8, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Myron C. Dagley appeals the grant of summary judgment for the defendants-appellees in his civil suit arising from his arrest on March 3, 1995. We have reviewed the record and the purported appellate arguments, and we find no error in the district court's determination. This appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The defendants-appellees' motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38 is GRANTED. The defendants-appellees are * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40903 -2- directed to submit, within 20 days, an itemized list of appellate costs and attorneys' fees for this court's determination of the monetary sanction. It is ORDERED that Dagley is BARRED from filing any pro se civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Dagley, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. Dagley is warned that future disparaging and vulgar language, as displayed in his response to the Rule 38 motion, will not be tolerated by this court. Dagley is directed to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not contain abusive language and to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED; ADMONISHMENT ISSUED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer