Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Taylor v. The Principal, 95-50291 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-50291 Visitors: 38
Filed: Jun. 27, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Q. Did you tell Mr. Matthews that you needed help A. ...I don’t know that I did. I don’t know that I didn’t. Q. Did you suggest - A. I felt that’s what I was asking him for, whether I verbally Q. Well, did you verbally tell him that you were - did you tel A. No.... Q. ...My specific question is, for whatever reason, okay, did y A. No, sir. The next day, Taylor sent Matthews an electronic mail (“E-Mail”) messag I THOUGHT AND WORRIED ABOUT OUR CONVERSATION ALL THE WAY HOME LAST BRUCE, I HAVE BEEN
More
          Q.     Did you tell Mr. Matthews that you needed help?

          A.     ...I don’t know that I did.   I don’t know that I didn’t.

          Q.     Did you suggest --

          A.     I felt that’s what I was asking him for, whether I verbally

          Q.     Well, did you verbally tell him that you were -- did you tel

          A.     No....



          Q.     ...My specific question is, for whatever reason, okay, did y

          A.     No, sir.

     The next day, Taylor sent Matthews an electronic mail (“E-Mail”) messag

          I THOUGHT AND WORRIED ABOUT OUR CONVERSATION ALL THE WAY HOME LAST

          BRUCE, I HAVE BEEN UNCHARACTERISTICALLY NEGATIVE; I GUESS THAT I H
          AND I MUST ADMIT THAT WHAT I GAVE YOU WERE LOW AND WHEN THE MASK C

          BRUCE, I BELIEVE THAT WE (THE EL PASO AGENCY AND ME) CAN HAVE A PO
          WOULD RECRUIT 7 PEOPLE THIS YEAR BEFORE JUNE 30.

          YOU GAVE ME UNTIL JUNE 30TH TO PROVE TO YOU SOME THINGS THAT I AM

     On June 24-25, 1993, Matthews met with Taylor in El Paso.     Matthews of

terminated.    In a subsequent telephone conversation, Taylor notified Matthew

     On July 1, 1993, Taylor received from Matthews a letter of understanding

the letter stated the following:

          I wish to share with you the standards which must be met by year en
          in the agency for the 1993 are unsatisfactory.



          These key performance results must be met by December 31, 1993 for

          *      Personally recruit at least three additional 01 agents, for

          *      One of the 01 agents must end the year at Agency Club level

          *      Two of the 01 agents must end the year at Level I and have b

          *      Total production from the 01 class must exceed $43,000 ICCs.

          *      Total agency production must exceed 4290,000 ICCs.

          *      Unit cost must be at or lower than 72 (Excludes agency manag

          We will look at the progress you are making at the end of the thir

          You have the talent to not only meet these requirements, but excee
42 U.S.C. § 12112. “Unless expressly stated otherwise, the standards applied

§ 504, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794).

     In Diagle v. Liberty Life Insurance Co., we set forth the elements of,

          A plaintiff may establish a claim of disability discrimination by
          
93 S. Ct. 1817
, 1824, 
36 L. Ed. 2d 668
(1973), may also be utilized.
          or she is qualified for the job; (3) he or she was subject to an a

Diagle v. Liberty Life Insurance Co., 
70 F.3d 394
, 396 (5th Cir. 1995) (int



     Taylor argues that summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine i

words to invoke the employer’s duty to provide reasonable accommodation.     Ta

bipolar disorder:

     1.   “I asked Mr. Matthews, specifically, for help.”

     2.   “What I’d ask you to do is to talk to the doctors in the Principal,
          about it.”

     3.   “I asked for a reduction in my objectives.”

     4.   “I asked for a lessening of the pressure.”

Taylor argues that his statements to Matthews raise a genuine fact issue as

     Taylor additionally argues that once he revealed his disability to Matthe

that a reasonable accommodation is not possible in a particular situation.   T



     Principal Mutual argues that Taylor’s statements to Matthews did not pu

fact, “all right.”   Principal Mutual argues that the claimed physical or ment

the employer must accommodate, but rather any limitations or restrictions ca

that it gave Taylor an accommodation in the form of additional time to meet

Principal Mutual asserts that, “having reasonably accommodated Taylor, Princ

     The ultimate issue presented to this Court is whether Taylor presented

42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq, by not making reasonable accommodations to a phys

prima facie case of ADA discrimination.   For the following reasons, we affir



Failure to Identify Limitation

     Under the ADA, an actionable disability means, in relevant part, a phys

show that the employer knew, or should have known, of such employee’s substa
an employee’s disabilities, limitations, and possible accommodations.9   In t

that Taylor failed to adduce summary judgment evidence which would allow a r




     For the foregoing reasons, the judgment entered by the district court i

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer