Filed: Jan. 22, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50327 Summary Calendar _ CHARLIE WILBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TERRY KEEL ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHARLIE WILBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ELIZABETH WATSON ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 94-CA-53 c/w 94-CA-54 - - - - - - - - - - January 8, 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50327 Summary Calendar _ CHARLIE WILBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TERRY KEEL ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CHARLIE WILBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ELIZABETH WATSON ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 94-CA-53 c/w 94-CA-54 - - - - - - - - - - January 8, 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-50327
Summary Calendar
__________________
CHARLIE WILBORN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TERRY KEEL ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CHARLIE WILBORN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ELIZABETH WATSON ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 94-CA-53 c/w 94-CA-54
- - - - - - - - - -
January 8, 1996
Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charlie Wilborn appeals from the district court's order
granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his
consolidated civil rights action. He argues that the arresting
officer and the technician from the Emergency Medical Service
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-50327
-2-
used excessive force at the time of his arrest and that the nurse
who attended him at the Travis County Jail was deliberately
indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. See Harper v. Harris County, Tex.,
21 F.3d 597, 600 (5th
Cir. 1994); Cupit v. Jones,
835 F.2d 82, 84 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.