Intl Brhd of Painter v. Amer Decorating Co, 95-50381 (1996)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-50381
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50381 Summary Calendar _ INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES UNION & INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AMERICAN DECORATING COMPANY; DAN LORD, Defendants-Appellants. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CA-067 - March 21, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellants appeal from the district court's ord
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50381 Summary Calendar _ INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES UNION & INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AMERICAN DECORATING COMPANY; DAN LORD, Defendants-Appellants. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CA-067 - March 21, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellants appeal from the district court's orde..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-50381 Summary Calendar __________________ INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES UNION & INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AMERICAN DECORATING COMPANY; DAN LORD, Defendants-Appellants. ---------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CA-067 ---------- March 21, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellants appeal from the district court's order finding them in contempt of the consent judgment. Appellants argue that a "Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment" filed by the parties bars subsequent actions based on alleged deficient pension contributions. We have reviewed the * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-50381 -2- record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades Union & Industry Pension Fund v. American Decorating Co., No. SA-94-CA-067 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 1995). AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener
