Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spellmon v. Morales, 95-50514 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-50514 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50514 Summary Calendar _ TERRENCE R. SPELLMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAN MORALES, Attorney General, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-94-CV-464) _ April 9, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Terrence Spellmon appeals from the dismissal of his suit, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state-court remedies. Bec
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                       _____________________

                           No. 95-50514

                          Summary Calendar
                       _____________________


          TERRENCE R. SPELLMON,

                                Plaintiff-Appellant,

          v.

          DAN MORALES, Attorney General, ET AL.,

                                Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                           (A-94-CV-464)
_________________________________________________________________
                           April 9, 1996
Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Terrence Spellmon appeals from the dismissal of his suit,

without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.

Because Spellmon fails to state a constitutional violation, he

has not stated a claim for relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2254

or 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   see Orellana v. Kyle, 
65 F.3d 29
, 31 (5th

Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 
116 S. Ct. 736
(1996).   The district

court's judgment is AFFIRMED.



     *
      Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer