Filed: Jul. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50523 USDC No. EP-95-CV-9 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIAS HERRERA-TERRAZAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - April 30, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Elias Herrera-Terrazas, Jr., requests leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the district court's de
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50523 USDC No. EP-95-CV-9 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIAS HERRERA-TERRAZAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - April 30, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Elias Herrera-Terrazas, Jr., requests leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the district court's den..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-50523
USDC No. EP-95-CV-9
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELIAS HERRERA-TERRAZAS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
- - - - - - - - - -
April 30, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Elias Herrera-Terrazas, Jr., requests leave to appeal in
forma pauperis (IFP) the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion. Because Herrera-Terraza's appeal fails to present
a nonfrivolous issue, his motion for IFP is DENIED. See Jackson
v. Dallas Police Dep't,
811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The
appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Herrera-Terraza's motion
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No.
-2-
for appointment of appellate counsel is DENIED as unnecessary.
See 5th Cir. Plan Under the Criminal Justice Act, § 2.