Filed: Apr. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50821 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALMA ROSA SALAZAR-GONZALES, a/k/a Alma Rosa Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-237 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES. PER CURIAM:* Salazar-Gonzales appeals her sentence after pleading guilt
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50821 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALMA ROSA SALAZAR-GONZALES, a/k/a Alma Rosa Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-237 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES. PER CURIAM:* Salazar-Gonzales appeals her sentence after pleading guilty..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-50821
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALMA ROSA SALAZAR-GONZALES, a/k/a Alma Rosa Mendoza,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-95-CR-237
- - - - - - - - - -
April 18, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
PER CURIAM:*
Salazar-Gonzales appeals her sentence after pleading guilty
to illegal reentry after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. She
argues that the district court misapplied the sentencing
guidelines by applying the 16-point upward adjustment of U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(2). She contends that her previous conviction for
burglary of a habitation should not be considered an aggravated
felony because she received a suspended sentence of probation.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-50821
-2-
The district court did not misapply the sentencing guidelines.
See United States v. Vasquez-Balandran,
76 F.3d 648 (5th Cir.
1996).
AFFIRMED.