Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-60083 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD TIMOTHY ROBINSON, a/k/a Richard Thomas Robinson, a/k/a Richard Timothy Robinson, and a/k/a Richard T. Cody, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-98-BN - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Cir
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-60083 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD TIMOTHY ROBINSON, a/k/a Richard Thomas Robinson, a/k/a Richard Timothy Robinson, and a/k/a Richard T. Cody, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-98-BN - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60083
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD TIMOTHY ROBINSON,
a/k/a Richard Thomas Robinson,
a/k/a Richard Timothy Robinson,
and a/k/a Richard T. Cody,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:94-CR-98-BN
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Richard Timothy Robinson has
filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and the
record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
