Filed: Apr. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-60366 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ANGELA STAFFNEY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-69-LN - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals from her guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession with int
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-60366 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ANGELA STAFFNEY, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94-CR-69-LN - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant appeals from her guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession with inte..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60366
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ANGELA STAFFNEY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:94-CR-69-LN
- - - - - - - - - -
April 18, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals from her guilty plea conviction and sentence
for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). She contends that the district
court erred in declining to apply a four-level decrease in her base
offense level for her role as a minimal participant under U.S.S.G.
§ 3B1.2(a).
We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district
court's oral ruling and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.