Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-10154 Conference Calendar _ RODNEY LEE WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOE V. YOUNG; SHAFFER, Doctor; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-152-BA - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rodney Lee Woods, #627825, appeals the magistrate judge's di
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-10154 Conference Calendar _ RODNEY LEE WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOE V. YOUNG; SHAFFER, Doctor; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-152-BA - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rodney Lee Woods, #627825, appeals the magistrate judge's dis..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-10154
Conference Calendar
__________________
RODNEY LEE WOODS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOE V. YOUNG; SHAFFER, Doctor;
JOHN DOE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:95-CV-152-BA
- - - - - - - - - -
June 25, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rodney Lee Woods, #627825, appeals the magistrate judge's
dismissal, without prejudice, of his claims against Joe V. Young,
Warden, French Robertson Unit, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit. Woods argues that the
magistrate judge abused his discretion in dismissing his claims
against Young on the ground that Woods failed to show the personal
involvement of Young in the cause of action. The court's
dismissal, without prejudice, of Woods' claims against Young
afforded Woods the opportunity to file an amended complaint
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-10154
-2-
alleging facts in support of Young's personal involvement. See
Good v. Allain,
823 F.2d 64, 67 (5th Cir. 1987). The magistrate
judge did not abuse his discretion in dismissing Woods' claims
against Young as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Booker
v. Koonce,
2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.