Filed: Apr. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-20141 Conference Calendar _ WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS DEP'T OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIV.; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-5741 - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William Robert Parker ap
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-20141 Conference Calendar _ WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS DEP'T OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIV.; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-5741 - - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William Robert Parker app..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-20141
Conference Calendar
__________________
WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TEXAS DEP'T OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIV.; TEXAS BOARD
OF PARDONS & PAROLES,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CA-H-95-5741
- - - - - - - - - -
April 16, 1996
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
William Robert Parker appeals the dismissal as frivolous of
his civil rights complaint. He does not challenge the district
court's imposition of sanctions. Therefore, that issue is deemed
abandoned on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler,
14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th
Cir. 1994).
For essentially the same reasons on which the district court
relied, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-20141
-2-
in dismissing Parker's complaint as frivolous. See Parker v.
Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice - Institutional Div., No. H-95-
5741 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 1996).
This appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This
opinion does not lessen the warning of sanction given to Parker
on this day in Parker v. Highland Ins., No. 96-20118. We again
caution Parker as to the consequences if he continues to waste
judicial resources by bringing frivolous appeals.
APPEAL DISMISSED. ADMONITION ISSUED.