Filed: Jul. 11, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30048 Summary Calendar CARL J. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STATE OF LOUISIANA, Through DOC, as Supervising Agency for Hunt Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-2575-B-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Carl J. Briggs appeals from the district
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30048 Summary Calendar CARL J. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STATE OF LOUISIANA, Through DOC, as Supervising Agency for Hunt Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-2575-B-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Carl J. Briggs appeals from the district ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30048
Summary Calendar
CARL J. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
STATE OF LOUISIANA, Through DOC,
as Supervising Agency for Hunt
Correctional Center,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 94-CV-2575-B-1
- - - - - - - - - -
July 1, 1996
Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Carl J. Briggs appeals from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment, dismissing his claim filed pursuant to the
Americans with Disability Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 12101-117. Briggs
contends that the ability to restrain inmates is not an essential
function of a corrections officer and that appellee failed to
make a reasonable accommodation. We have reviewed the record and
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-30048
- 2 -
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the magistrate judge. See Briggs v. State of
Louisiana, No. 94-CV-2575-B-1 (M.D. La. Sept. 6, 1995).
AFFIRMED.