Filed: Jul. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50176 USDC No. W-95-CV-232 FRANK JANUARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Frank January (TDCJ #361639) has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. January appeals the distric
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50176 USDC No. W-95-CV-232 FRANK JANUARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Frank January (TDCJ #361639) has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. January appeals the district..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50176
USDC No. W-95-CV-232
FRANK JANUARY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
- - - - - - - - - -
July 11, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Frank January (TDCJ #361639) has filed a motion to proceed
in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. January appeals the district
court's dismissal of his complaint without prejudice, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to comply with
magistrate judge's order to submit an application to proceed in
forma pauperis properly verified by prison officials or to pay
the requisite filing fee.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-50176
-2-
January has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that his motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP
is DENIED. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't,
811 F.2d 260, 261
(5th Cir. 1986). Because his appeal is frivolous, the appeal is
DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.