Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50228 Conference Calendar JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BILL CLINTON, President of the United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-95-CV-213 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jerry Lewis Dedrick, T
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-50228 Conference Calendar JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BILL CLINTON, President of the United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-95-CV-213 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jerry Lewis Dedrick, Te..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50228
Conference Calendar
JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BILL CLINTON,
President of the United States of America,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-95-CV-213
- - - - - - - - - -
June 26, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jerry Lewis Dedrick, Texas prisoner #662909, has filed a
request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal of the
district court’s dismissal of his action construed as a petition
for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Fed. R.
App. P. 22(b). Dedrick argues that his state conviction for
delivery of cocaine violates his Equal Protection rights because
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-50228
- 2 -
the defendants are also involved in drug-trafficking but have not
been convicted for the drug offenses. Because Dedrick failed to
exhaust his state remedies, we DENY his IFP motion and DISMISS
his appeal. See Richardson v. Procunier,
762 F.2d 429, 431-32
(5th Cir. 1985). We also DENY as moot Dedrick’s motions for
summary judgment and appointment of counsel.
IFP MOTION DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT; APPEAL DISMISSED.