Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-60053 Summary Calendar _ THERAL DARNELL TERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STEVE PUCKETT; EDWARD HARGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY; JOAN ROSS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:95-CV-303-D-A - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-60053 Summary Calendar _ THERAL DARNELL TERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STEVE PUCKETT; EDWARD HARGETT, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY; JOAN ROSS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:95-CV-303-D-A - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Th..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-60053
Summary Calendar
__________________
THERAL DARNELL TERRY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
STEVE PUCKETT; EDWARD HARGETT,
SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE
PENITENTIARY; JOAN ROSS,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 4:95-CV-303-D-A
- - - - - - - - - -
April 26, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Theral Darnell Terry appeals from the district court's
dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6). He contends that he was denied a classification
hearing before an impartial classification committee, that he was
not provided with a written statement of the reasons for the
change in his classification, that he was denied his annual
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-60053
-2-
classification hearing, and that his placement in close
confinement prevents him from earning good-time credits. We have
reviewed the record and, construing the dismissal as pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), find no reversible error. See Holloway v.
Gunnell,
685 F.2d 150, 152 (5th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.